Tuesday, May 26, 2015

5 Tricks To Add Glow To Your Skin

5 Ways To Get Beautifully Glowing Skin

If there is one thing that I absolutely adore is when I wake up from my mid-day nap and my skin is smooth, my cheeks are rosy and my face is so glowing, that I don’t even think about reaching out for  my favorite BB cream. Sadly, as I can’t take naps every 2 hours, I had to find ways to achieve that gorgeous healthy look and keep it during the day. And I’ve found them (YAY)!

Today, I’ll share with you my tested-and-proven-to-work tricks that make my skin look dewy, radiant and fresh – anytime!

Face Mists

Miraculous potion in a bottle - this is what it is. Face mist are my favorite beauty item (after my 354 lip sticks/glosses/balms...you can never have enough...). What I love most about face mists is that they deliver immediate results (a very nice dewy look) and you can spritz them on your face anytime (even if you are wearing  makeup). Actually, some mists even fix makeup and help it stay at place.

Face mists are like water injection for your skin. Whenever you feel tightness and your skin looks dull, a nice cloud of tiny, almost microscopic drops, full of moisture is there to save the day. Visible results in a minute – what not to love about it?

What To Try: Rose Hydrating Mist

This gentle alcohol-free toner is designed to re-balance your skin’s pH and stimulate the natural radiance with its refreshing and revitalizing properties. Formulated with Rosa damascena (Rose), Jasmine and Geranium essential oils for a calm and soothing effect. Rose Hydrating Mist is perfect for normal, dry, and highly sensitive skin, helping to reduce pore size appearance. Bisabolol and Pro-Vitamin B5 help moisturize and hydrate while removing surface impurities and toxins, as well as help prevent the visible signs of aging.

Get It Here


Get Yourself Moving

It may sound cliché but it works! When you sweat out a little you improve the blood flow to the skin surface which means more nutrients and oxygen for the cells. And happy, nourished cells just can’t “look bad”!


Regular Exfoliation

Did you know that in 30% of the time (maybe even 50%) your skin looks grey and lifeless, because it’s covered with a layer of dead cells. Doesn’t sound nice, does it? Removing the dead epidermal cells that accumulate daily is essential if you want to have smooth skin surface and radiant, even complexion. Just make sure not to overdo it –  over-exfoliating can make your skin drier and more susceptible to infections and redness. Using a scrub two times a week is considered “safe & beneficial” though I’d suggest monitoring how your skin feels, so you can reduce or increase the number of exfoliations per week, if necessary.

What To Try: Jojoba Beds & Argan Oil Exfoliating Scrub

La Mav's organic scrub is infused with Argan oil and Jojoba for a luxurious yet gentle bio-exfoliant that leaves the skin clean, toned and energized. Formulated with Jojoba and Oat extract to help fight inflammation, this scrub exfoliates and removes excess oil and impurities, providing a natural and glowing vitality to your skin.

Get It Here

Cream Cleansers

Have you ever tried using a cream cleanser? You won’t believe what a difference it makes!  SLES free, with nice creamy texture, enriched with oils and moisturizing ingredients – the ultimate “impurities killer” that will leaves your skin super soft and fresh!

If you don’t like it after the first use, because it doesn’t leave your skin “squeaky clean”, let me tell you something - squeaky clean is not sexy! Trust me. “Squeaky clean” often leads to dehydrated, tight skin that looks absolutely lifeless several minutes after you’ve removed all dirt and makeup from it. And lifeless skin can’t be radiant, you know it.

What To Try: Hydra Calm Cleansing Cream

Winner of the Nature & Health 2012 Beauty Award, this gentle cleanser is designed for dry skin to wash away impurities, perspiration and pollutants, deeply hydrating and conditioning the skin.  Formulated with Bio-Flavonoids, Jojoba Oil and Shea Butter to moisturize and cleanse the skin which will reveal a clear, bright, smooth surface.

Get It Here


Vitamin Boost

Having a balanced, rich diet is essential, because the way you skin looks depends directly on what you eat, but delivering a daily vitamin “cocktail” from an outside source is just as important. Vitamins like C, E and A not only protect your skin from free radicals, thanks to their antioxidant properties, but also improve skin’s clarity, its texture and its overall condition.

When I want to “vitaminize” my skin I always opt for serums – they are much more concentrated, compared to creams and lotions, which guarantees better results in less time (ain’t nobody got time to wait, right?).

At the present moment, my “hero” is  vitamin C – it boosts collagen production, brightens the skin tone, minimizes dark spots and fine lines and gives my face a wonderful healthy glow. L-O-V-E it!

What To Try: Daily Vitamin C Brightening Serum

Formulated with Bearberry extract and Melissa officinalis extracts to promote healthy, glowing and evenly toned skin. This highly concentrated brightening Vitamin-C serum will improves your skin’s clarity and boosts radiance.  Daily use will also help counter pigmentation while strengthening collagen and elastin for luminous and younger looking skin.

Get It Here

If you liked this post, let us know by sharing it! Share and get $5 off for youre next order with La Mav!



from La Mav Combined http://ift.tt/1F8XWqz
via IFTTT

Monsanto Bids to Take Over Syngenta—A Move to Assure a Pesticide-Saturated Future?

By Dr. Mercola

Monsanto recently made a bid to take over European agrichemical giant Syngenta, the world’s largest pesticide producer. The $45 billion bid was rejected, but there’s still a chance for a merger between these two chemical technology giants.

Monsanto is reportedly considering raising the offer, and as noted by Mother Jones,1 “combined, the two companies would form a singular agribusiness behemoth, a company that controls a third of both the globe's seed and pesticides markets.”

As reported by Bloomberg,2 the possibility of Monsanto taking over Syngenta raises a number of concerns; a top one being loss of crop diversity.

“...[A] larger company would eventually mean fewer varieties of seeds available to farmers, say opponents such as [science policy analyst at the Center for Food Safety, Bill] Freese.

Another is that the combined company could spur increased use of herbicides by combining Syngenta’s stable of weed killers with Monsanto’s marketing heft and crop development expertise.

‘Two really big seed companies becoming one big seed company means even less choice for farmers,’ said Patty Lovera, assistant director of Food and Water Watch, a policy group in Washington.

‘From a public health and environmental perspective this is a complete disaster,’ said Bill Freese... ‘The more I look at this, the more it worries me and the more it needs to be opposed.’”

What’s in a Name?

According to one analyst, the takeover might boost Monsanto’s reputation, as Syngenta has been “less publicly enthusiastic” about genetically engineered (GE) crops.

Personally, I don’t foresee Monsanto ever being able to shed its toxic reputation, no matter how it tries to rebrand itself. It recently tried to do just that by declaring itself "sustainable agriculture company.”

But actions speak louder than mere words, and there’s nothing sustainable about Monsanto’s business. Taking on the Syngenta name would do nothing to change the obnoxious dichotomy between Monsanto’s words and deeds.

In fact, Mother Jones astutely notes that by trying to acquire Syngenta, Monsanto contradicts “years of rhetoric about how its ultimate goal with biotech is to wean farmers off agrichemicals.”

It’s quite clear Monsanto has no desire or plans to help farmers reduce the use of crop chemicals. On the contrary, it has and continues to push for the increased use of its flagship product, Roundup.

Roundup Also Being Used to Harvest Non-GMO Crops

Not only has Monsanto created a line of GE Roundup-ready seeds, it also promotes the use of Roundup on conventional crops, pre-harvest, as described in its Pre-Harvest Staging Guide.3

Applying herbicide directly before harvesting helps dry the crop, boosts the release of seed, and is said to promote long-term control of certain weeds.

The practice is known as desiccation, and according to researchers Samsel and Seneff,4 the desiccation of conventionally grown wheat appears to be linked to the rapid and concurrent rise in celiac disease.

Applying glyphosate, which was recently classified as a Class 2A probable human carcinogen, on crops directly before harvest is one of the dumbest things we could do to our foods, yet Monsanto wholeheartedly supports and promotes it.

Speaking of reputation, Syngenta is hardly a poster child for sustainability and right action either. Not only is it the main supplier of the “gender-bending” herbicide atrazine in the US, it also makes neonicotinoids—a class of insecticide linked to the mass die-offs of bees and other pollinators

Both of these chemicals have come under increasing scrutiny as researchers have learned more about their environmental and human health impacts, and both are banned in Europe while still widely in use in the US.

Suppressing Science for the Chemical Industry?

As scrutiny into the effects of chemicals has intensified, so has strong-arm tactics by the industry, which has successfully infiltrated the very agencies charged with their oversight.

An open letter5 signed by more than 25 farmworker, environmental, and food safety organizations was sent to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) on May 5, demanding the agency investigate reports of retaliation and suppression of research relating to the dangers of neonicotinoids and glyphosate.6

"It is imperative that the USDA maintains scientific integrity and does not allow for harassment, censorship, or suppression of findings that counter the interests of industry," the letter states.

In March, the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) filed a citizen petition requesting that the US Department of Agriculture adopt new policies that would further job protection for government scientists who question the health and safety of agricultural chemicals.

The petition urges for the agency to adopt policies that would specifically prevent the ‘political suppression or alteration of studies and lay out clear procedures for investigating allegations and of scientific misconduct.’

PEER has found that more than 10 USDA scientists have faced consequences or investigations when their work called into question the health and safety of agricultural chemicals.

These scientists documented clear actions that violated their scientific integrity, including USDA officials retracting studies, watering down findings, removing scientists’ names from authorship, and delaying approvals for publication of research papers.”

Many Elementary School Children at Risk of Elevated Pesticide Exposure

Monsanto’s marketing materials still proclaim its GE crops reduce the need for pesticides, but usage has steadily and significantly risen since the advent of GE seeds. The rapid emergence of resistant superweeds have led the industry to invent crop seeds resistant to even more toxic herbicides, such as 2,4-D and dicamba.

According to Dr. Medardo Ávila-Vázquez,7 a pediatrician and neonatologist at the Faculty of Medical Sciences at the National University of Córdoba, glyphosate use in connection to GMO seeds is having a notably deleterious effect on the health of the local people, particularly children.

In light of the approval of these next-generation pesticides, it would behoove us to take notice to such warnings, because our kids are also becoming increasingly exposed. As reported by Global Research,8 children attending hundreds of elementary schools across the US are in harm’s way as toxic weed killers are doused on nearby GE fields in ever greater amounts:

“A new EWG interactive map shows the amounts of glyphosate sprayed in each US county and tallies the 3,247 elementary schools that are located within 1,000 feet of a corn or soybean field and the 487 schools that are within 200 feet. Click on any county on the map to see how much GMO corn and soy acreage has increased there as well as the number of nearby elementary schools.”

You will see that several states are outlined. This is where the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved the use of Dow AgroSciences’ Enlist Duo. This new herbicide, which is a mix of glyphosate and 2,4-D, will be used on a new generation of GE corn and soybeans engineered to withstand both of these toxins. Many of these states are already heavily sprayed with Roundup, and with the introduction of Enlist Duo, children who go to school near these farm fields may be exposed to greater risks than ever before.

The Organic Effect

While environmental exposure is certainly a concern, most people are exposed to pesticides via their diet. Claimed to be the largest of its kind, a study9 published in the Environmental Health Perspectives looked at the diets of nearly 4,500 people living in six US cities, assessing exposure levels to organophosphates (OPs), which are among the most commonly used pesticides on American farms.

Participants’ organophosphate levels were estimated using USDA data10 on the average levels of pesticide residue found in the fruits and vegetables that each individual reported eating. To verify the accuracy of their estimates, they compared their calculated pesticide exposures to the actual levels of pesticide metabolites (breakdown products) excreted in the urine of a subset of 720 participants.

Not surprisingly, those who ate conventionally grown produce were found to have high concentrations of OP metabolites, whereas those who ate organic produce had significantly lower levels. Those who “often or always” ate organic had about 65 percent lower levels of pesticide residues compared to those who ate the least amount of organic produce. According to lead author Cynthia Curl: “The study suggests that by eating organically grown versions of those foods highest in pesticide residues, we can make a measurable difference.”

The “organic effect” was also recently demonstrated by a Swedish family that agreed to eat nothing but organic food for two weeks. 11 Pesticide levels were measured before and after the switch, and after a fortnight of eating an all-organic diet, the family members’ toxic load had diminished to virtually nothing. While many organic foods have been shown to contain higher levels of nutrients,12,13,14 one of the major benefits you reap from eating organic is what you don’t get from your diet—all those toxic chemicals!


A Stanford University meta-analysis15 published in 2012 found that people who eat an organic diet not only tend to have lower levels of toxic pesticides in their system, organic meats were also far less likely to contain multi-drug resistant bacteria, which is yet another major health threat.

Many still insist we don’t know what the health ramifications are from eating pesticide-tainted foods, but common sense will tell you the effect is not going to do your health any favors. Many pesticides also do have well-established health effects. Organophosphate (OP) pesticides, for example, have been linked to reduced IQ and attention deficits in children.16,17 Symptoms of exposure include weakness, headache, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting.

Long-term exposure has been linked to neurological effects, such as18 confusion, anxiety, and depression. According to data19 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than 75 percent of the US population has detectable levels of OPs in their urine, and unless you’re a farmer, or live near a farm, your diet is one of the most likely routes of exposure. Considering depression affects one in 10 Americans, who’s to say OP pesticide exposure isn’t part of the problem?

Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce

To protect your health, your best bet is to buy only organic fruits and vegetables. That said, not all conventionally grown fruits and vegetables are subjected to the same amount of pesticide load. One way to save some money while still lowering your risk is by focusing on purchasing certain organic items, while “settling” for others that are conventionally grown. To do this, I recommend familiarizing yourself with the Environmental Working Group’s (EWG) annual Shoppers' Guide to Pesticides in Produce.20

Of the fruits and vegetables tested by the EWG for the 2015 guide, the following “dirty dozen” had the highest pesticide load, making them the most important to buy or grow organically. Also remember that swapping your regular meat sources to organic, grass-fed/pasture-raised versions of beef and poultry may be even more important than buying organic fruits and vegetables. The same goes for dairy products and animal by-products such as eggs.

Apples Peaches Nectarines
Strawberries Grapes Celery
Spinach Sweet bell peppers Cucumbers
Cherry tomatoes Imported snap peas Potatoes

In contrast, the following foods were found to have the lowest residual pesticide load, making them the safest bet among conventionally grown vegetables. Note that a small amount of sweet corn and most Hawaiian papaya, although low in pesticides, are genetically engineered (GE). If you’re unsure of whether the sweet corn or papaya is GE, I’d recommend opting for organic varieties. To review the ranking of all foods tested, please see the EWG’s 2015 Shoppers' Guide to Pesticides in Produce.21

Avocado Sweet corn Pineapple
Cabbage Frozen sweet peas Onions
Asparagus Mangoes Papayas (non-GMO. Most Hawaiian papaya is GMO)
Kiwi Eggplant Grapefruit
Cantaloupe Cauliflower Sweet potatoes

Where to Find Healthy Food

One of the most compelling reasons to eat organic is to avoid toxins. Organic foods do tend to have a better nutritional profile, but even if they do not, the absence of drugs, pesticides, hormones, and antibiotics is more than enough of a reason to make the switch to protect your health. For a step-by-step guide to making healthier diet choices, please see my freely available optimized nutrition plan, starting with the beginner plan.

While many food stores carry organic foods these days, your best bet is to source it from a local grower, as much of the organic food sold in grocery stores is imported. Not only has this food traveled a long distance, adding to the carbon footprint, but some countries may have more lax organic standards than others.

Buying local food also supports local farmers and promotes the establishment of a more sustainable local food system. If you reside in the US, the following organizations can help you locate farm-fresh foods in the vicinity of where you live. Even better would be to grow it yourself. The nation’s health would radically improve if we could reestablish World War II Victory gardens.

Weston Price Foundation22 -- has local chapters in most states, and many of them are connected with buying clubs in which you can easily purchase organic foods, including grass fed raw dairy products like milk and butter.
Local Harvest -- This Web site will help you find farmers' markets, family farms, and other sources of sustainably grown food in your area where you can buy produce, grass-fed meats, and many other goodies.
Farmers' Markets -- A national listing of farmers' markets.
Eat Well Guide: Wholesome Food from Healthy Animals -- The Eat Well Guide is a free online directory of sustainably raised meat, poultry, dairy, and eggs from farms, stores, restaurants, inns, and hotels, and online outlets in the United States and Canada.
Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture (CISA) -- CISA is dedicated to sustaining agriculture and promoting the products of small farms.
FoodRoutes -- The FoodRoutes "Find Good Food" map can help you connect with local farmers to find the freshest, tastiest food possible. On their interactive map, you can find a listing for local farmers, CSAs, and markets near you.


from La Mav Combined http://snip.ly/Y2I6
via IFTTT

US Honeybee Losses Soar Over Last Year, USDA Finds

By Dr. Mercola

A world without bees would be a very different place. Bees are pollinators – and critical ones at that. Of the 100 different crops that make up 90 percent of the world’s diet, bees pollinate 70.

The crops that make up about one out of every three bites of food depend on bees to flourish. Without bees, the fruits, vegetables, nuts, and seeds that you may currently take for granted at your grocery store could cease to exist… and along with them, the many other species that depend on them for food.

In an effort to show the critical importance of bees, one Whole Foods store removed all produce from plants dependent on pollinators. This involved pulling 237 of 453 products (or 52 percent) from the shelves. A sampling of the produce that disappeared without bees included the following:1

Apples Onions Avocados
Carrots Mangos Lemons
Limes Honeydew Cantaloupe
Zucchini Summer squash Eggplant
Cucumbers Celery Green onions
Cauliflower Leeks Bok choy
Kale Broccoli Broccoli rabe
Mustard greens

Honeybee Losses Soar in the US

In the 1940s, there were 5 million managed honeybee colonies in the US. Today there are half that number, while demand for pollination services (for crops including almonds, berries, and more) has increased.

Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), which is basically defined as a dead bee colony with no adult bees, or a colony with a live queen and only immature bees present, is often blamed for the ongoing honeybee losses, but no “official” cause has been named. According to the USDA’s internal research agency, the Agricultural Research Service (ARS):2

Colony losses from CCD are a very serious problem for beekeepers. Annual losses from the winter of 2006-2011 averaged about 33 percent each year, with a third of these losses attributed to CCD by beekeepers. The winter of 2011-2012 was an exception, when total losses dropped to 22 percent.

A 1-year drop is too short a time period to count as definitive improvement in honey bee colony survivorship. At least 2 to 3 years of consistently lower loss percentages is necessary before it is possible to be sure that CCD is on the decline.”

Indeed, the latest numbers from the USDA show that honeybee losses are, in fact, continuing to climb. From April 2014 to April 2015, losses of honeybee colonies hit 42 percent, which is the second highest annual loss to date.3 This percentage is down from 45 percent in 2012-2013, but remained well above the three prior years’ annual measurements.

Honeybee Losses Are Occurring at an ‘Economically Unsustainable’ Level

The USDA considers 18.7 percent to be the benchmark beyond which the losses become economically unsustainable. Even at the 33 percent level, ARS noted:4

“If losses continue at the 33 percent level, it could threaten the economic viability of the bee pollination industry. Honey bees would not disappear entirely, but the cost of honey bee pollination services would rise, and those increased costs would ultimately be passed on to consumers through higher food costs.”

Jeff Pettis, a USDA senior entomologist, told Reuters regarding the latest numbers:5

"Such high colony losses in the summer and year-round remain very troubling… The bees should be surviving better, but the numbers say otherwise.”

The fact that high summer losses have been noted is also important, as mite infestations are more likely to occur in the winter. Bayer, Syngenta, and other chemical companies have blamed mites as a reason for the bee deaths, but the latest summer losses weaken their argument, according to Pettis. Instead, pesticide exposure is a likely factor.

Pesticide-Coated Seeds May Be Killing Bees

The majority of soybean, corn, canola, and sunflower seeds planted in the US are coated with neonicotinoid pesticides (neonics). The chemicals, which are produced by Bayer and Syngenta, travel systemically through the plants and kill insects that munch on their roots and leaves.

Neonicotinoids are powerful neurotoxins and are quite effective at killing the pests… but they’re also being blamed for decimating populations on non-target pests, namely pollinators such as bees and butterflies.

This occurs because the pesticides are taken up through the plant's vascular system as it grows, and, as a result, the chemical is expressed in the pollen and nectar of the plant.

Despite accumulating evidence that neonics are implicated in widespread bee deaths across the US, Monsanto, DuPont, and Dow, which sell the treated seeds, have no intention of stopping.

In 2013, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) released a report that ruled neonicotinoid insecticides are essentially “unacceptable” for many crops,6 and in the US, the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) announced that they were restricting the use of 18 pesticide products containing dinotefuran, a type of neonicotinoid.

Neonicotinoids have been increasingly blamed for bee deaths (and were implicated in the 2013 mass bee die-off of 25,000 bumblebees along with millions of bee deaths in Canada), prompting the European Union (EU) to ban them for two years, beginning December 1, 2013, to study their involvement with large bee kills.

Meanwhile, an independent review by 29 scientists with the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (which looked at 800 studies) put another nail in the coffin for neonicotinoids. The study found neonicotinoids are gravely harming bees and other pollinators (like butterflies). The research also showed serious harm to birds, earthworms, snails, and other invertebrates.7 One of the researchers, Jean-Marc Bonmatin with the National Centre for Scientific Research, said:8

"The evidence is very clear. We are witnessing a threat to the productivity of our natural and farmed environment equivalent to that posed by organophosphates or DDT… Far from protecting food production, the use of neonicotinoid insecticides is threatening the very infrastructure which enables it."

Monoculture and the Destruction of Grasslands Lead to Bee Death

It’s imperative to understand that agriculture is a complete “system” based on inter-related factors, and in order to maintain ecological balance and health, you must understand how that system works as a whole. Any time you change one part of that system, you change the interaction of all the other components, because they work together. It is simply impossible to change just one minor aspect without altering the entire system, and this is in part why monoculture is so destructive.

Monoculture is the growing of just one type of crop on a massive scale – a growing method that is contrary to nature. NPR commentator and science writer Craig Childs decided to replicate a photo project by David Liittschwager, a portrait photographer who spent years traveling the world dropping one-cubic-foot metal frames into gardens, streams, parks, forests, and oceans, photographing anything and everything that entered the frame.

Around the world, his camera captured thousands of plants, animals, and insects within the cubes, with entirely different “worlds” of plants and animals living as little as a few feet away from each other. But whereas Littschwager’s camera captured several dozens of insects wherever he set up his frames, Childs found nothing stirring among the genetically modified (GM) corn stalks on one 600-acre farm in Iowa. As reported by NPR:9

“It felt like another planet entirely,” Childs said. “I listened and heard nothing, no birds, no clicks from insects. There were no bees. The air, the ground, seemed vacant. Yet, 100 years ago, these same fields, these prairies, were home to 300 species of plants, 60 mammals, 300 birds, hundreds and hundreds of insects… This soil was the richest, the loamiest in the state. And now, in these patches, there is almost literally nothing but one kind of living thing. We’ve erased everything else.

There's something strange about a farm that intentionally creates a biological desert to produce food for one species: us. It's efficient, yes. But it's so efficient that the ants are missing, the bees are missing, and even the birds stay away. Something's not right here. Our cornfields are too quiet.”

Midwest Bees ‘Get It from All Sides’

GM corn is the epitome of monoculture, and the vast majority of GM corn is treated with neonicotinoids like clothianidin or thiamethoxam. As reported by Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), honeybees in the Midwest “get it from all sides” when the vast expanses of GM corn are planted, as they:10

  • “Fly through clothianidin-contaminated planter dust
  • Gather clothianidin-laced corn pollen, which will then be fed to emerging larva
  • Gather water from acutely toxic, pesticide-laced guttation droplets
  • Gather pollen and nectar from nearby fields where forage sources such as dandelions have taken up these persistent chemicals from soil that’s been contaminated year on year since clothianidin’s widespread introduction into corn cultivation in 2003”

And the neonicotinoids are not the only chemicals the bees have to worry about. According to PANNA:11

“Over the last 15 years, US corn cultivation has gone from a crop requiring little-to-no insecticides and negligible amounts of fungicides, to a crop where the average acre is grown from seeds treated or genetically engineered to express three different insecticides (as well as a fungicide or two) before being sprayed prophylactically with Roundup (an herbicide) and a new class of fungicides that farmers didn’t know they 'needed' before the mid-2000s.”

Measures that target single classes of pesticides, though a move in the right direction, may actually be falling short. In 2013, researchers analyzed pollen from bee hives in seven major crops and found 35 different pesticides along with high fungicide loads.12 Each sample contained, on average, nine different pesticides and fungicides, although one contained 21 different chemicals. Furthermore, when the pollen was fed to healthy bees, they had a significant decline in the ability to resist infection with the Nosema ceranae parasite, which has been implicated in CCD.

Pollinators Are Losing Their Natural Foraging Areas

In addition to exposure to agricultural chemicals, mass conversions of grasslands to corn and soy in the Midwest have dramatically reduced bees’ natural foraging areas. This is affecting not only bees but also other pollinators like the Monarch butterfly. Milkweeds are critical to the Monarch’s survival because they’re the only food source for Monarch larvae.

Milkweeds that used to abundantly line the Monarch’s flight path have been largely eradicated by modern agriculture. Not only are chemicals, including the herbicide Roundup, killing the milkweeds, but prairies are being replaced by cornfields, and roadsides are being mowed where milkweeds previously grew wild.

Many equate modern farming techniques with “progress,” when in fact many of our technological “advancements” are now threatening to destroy us right along with the entire planet. There are major differences between industrial farming and regenerative agriculture, and the foods produced by the former cannot be equated to the foods produced by the latter. GM plants and industrial farming contributes to every form of environmental devastation, while organic farming methods support, restore, and rejuvenate the ecosystem.

What Can Help to Save the Bees?

By plowing up grasslands to grow monocrops, we are contributing to environmental destruction and world hunger. One important factor that some experts believe is KEY for reversing environmental devastation is to return much of our land to grasslands and build a network of herbivore economics. There is no better way to improve the conditions for animals, protect pollinators, bring more revenue to farmers, and improve our health by purchasing nutritious foods from properly pastured animals.

By mimicking the natural behavior of migratory herds of wild grazing animals—meaning allowing livestock to graze freely, and moving the herd around in specific patterns—farmers can support nature's efforts to regenerate and thrive, while providing natural, chemical-free foraging area for pollinators and other beneficial insects.

The good news is that we don't need to invent yet another chemical or a new piece of farm equipment to solve this problem. We simply need to revert to a system that works with nature rather than against it. And this involves grazing cattle. My previous article discussing the work of ecologist Allan Savory goes into this process in greater detail.

Further, to avoid harming bees and other helpful pollinators that visit your garden, swap out toxic pesticide and lawn chemicals for organic weed and pest control alternatives. Even some organic formulations can be harmful to beneficial insects, so be sure to vet your products carefully. Better yet, get rid of your lawn altogether and plant an edible organic garden. Both flower and vegetable gardens provide good honeybee habitats. It's also recommended to keep a small basin of fresh water in your garden or backyard, as bees actually do get thirsty.

In order to support the Monarch butterflies, consider planting a locally appropriate species of milkweed in your garden, on your farm, or wherever you manage habitat. You can use the Milkweed Seed Finder to locate seeds in your area. Whatever you choose to grow, please avoid purchasing pesticide-treated plants. Cut flower growers are among the heaviest users of toxic agricultural chemicals, including pesticides, so if you must buy cut flowers, make sure you select only organically grown and/or fair trade bouquets.

Ideally, you'll want to grow your own pollinator-friendly plants from organic, untreated seed, but if you opt to purchase starter plants, make sure to ask whether or not they've been pre-treated with pesticides. Keep in mind that you also help protect the welfare of all pollinators every time you shop organic and grass-fed, as you are actually “voting” for less pesticides and herbicides with every organic and pastured food and consumer product you buy.

You can take bee preservation a step further by trying your hand at amateur beekeeping. Maintaining a hive in your garden requires only about an hour of your time each week, benefits your local ecosystem—and you get to enjoy your own homegrown honey!



from La Mav Combined http://snip.ly/kWCb
via IFTTT

Monday, May 25, 2015

Carol’s Beauty Natural Sun Tanning Enhancers

Summer is approaching fast, bringing us sunny and warm weather, so many of us are getting ready to hit the beaches. As much as I love sea and beaches, I mostly spend my time under an umbrella or in a shadow. However, I know that not all of you are like me. I know that many girls don’t […]

from La Mav Combined http://snip.ly/q6nx
via IFTTT

Makeup Tips For Rosacea

4 Makeup Tips To Help You "Cover" Rosacea

Finding the best makeup for your skin can be tough (and I don’t mean just colorwise). We’ve all been there and we know it – discovering our own beauty holy grail takes time, money and patience. Now imagine, if you have specific skin concerns like redness, pimples and hypersensitivity (all in one)?! Suddenly, finding makeup that works for you and give you naturally looking flawless skin becomes even harder. If you have  rosacea, you get the point.

Did you know, though, that there are some easy tricks that can literally transform your beauty routine and make your life much easier, even if you are struggling with rosacea (and all skin concerns that go hand in hand with it)?
Rosacea doesn’t have to “stand for” 30-minutes-in-front-of-the-mirror-every-morning-concealing-my-imperfections and ridiculous-amounts-of-money-spent-on-high-end-makeup-products! Not anymore.

Start With A Base

Good makeup base/primer is a must if you want good coverage and long-lasting look (no one likes to do touch-ups during the day, right?). Applying a base will facilitate the actual makeup application – your foundation will blend smoothly, allowing you to get the results you want in less time and with less effort + your skin will stay perfect all-day-long!

If you have redness prone skin, try with green or yellowish base, because both the green and the yellow color neutralize the red one. Once you have toned down the redness, it will be easier for you to cover the tiny imperfections left.

Note: If you are skeptic about makeup bases, alternatively, you can try  BB creams. BB creams are true miracle workers – they moisturize, even the skin surface and the skin tone, add nice healthy glow, nourish your skin in depth, to prevent the visible signs of aging and perform impressively well when used as makeup base. 


New to BB Creams? Let us suggest one!

La Mav Organic BB Crème is not only the perfect colour balancing makeup base, but it also provides an anti-ageing remedy and natural protection from the sun all whilst leaving your skin feeling smooth, radiant and hydrated. Reduce your daily makeup routine down to one highly effective product that is easy to apply and very affordable. La Mav BB Crème is perfect for those with hypersensitive skin, or conditions such as Rosacea, Eczema and Acne.

Order Your BB Cream


The Right Application Technique

Start by blending your foundation/BB cream, until you achieve even and balanced skin tone. Then, in the zones where you need more coverage, tap instead of blending (be it with your fingers or with makeup brush). When you blend, you spread the product “too much” and thus reduce its coverage. Tapping it the best way to layer your foundation and at the same time get a natural finish – be it over the red zones or any areas of your face that needs some proper concealing.

Note: In order to avoid irritations, don’t rub or stretch your skin too hard and always choose gentle makeup brushes.

Consider Mineral Makeup

Mineral makeup has been around for decades and is preferred by many, not only because it’s safer and more natural (compared to regular foundations, loaded with harmful chemicals), but also because it provides natural long-lasting finish and it protects your skin from the sun (both from UVA & UVB rays). Being super gentle and non-irritating,  minerals are great pick for people with rosacea – even for those struggling with ultra-sensitive skin.

Another plus mineral makeup has is that it’s buildable. This means you don’t need 3 separate products to obtain a flawless finish. A few more “puffs” with the kabuki brush over the zones that need more coverage and you are ready to go. Effortlessly perfect!

Bonus tip: Finishing with a slightly yellow setting/ mattifying powder is another way to keep your makeup at place and to tone down the redness. Apply it in moderation, to avoid the unwanted “powdery” look.

La Mav Mineral foundation is a concealer, foundation, sunscreen and powder all-in-one that provides a flawless finish, giving your skin a natural and radiant look without clogging pores or causing irritation. La Mav Anti-Ageing Minerals™ offer a chemical-free alternative to traditional foundations and are suitable for all skin type and conditions.

All products in our Anti Ageing Minerals™ line are infused with Vitamin C and Rosehip Oil providing proven anti-ageing benefit while also nourishing and protecting your skin from free radicals!

Order Your Minerals Now


Easy With Shimmer

Though I am a huge fan of highlighters, I know when I can and when I can’t use them. The problem with shimmery products is that aside from giving lovely glow to your skin they draw attention to any imperfections on the skin surface. Since rosacea often causes appearance of bumps (sometimes similar to pimples) reaching for a highlighter may not be a very good idea. If you want to “awake” your skin after you are done concealing, you can opt for a less shimmery bronzer, for example. If you have pale skin, apply just a tiny bit, in order to avoid looking “cakey”. If you can’t get it right the first time, don’t worry – it may take several applications, before you master the skill of getting a nice sun-kissed finish, but it’s totally worth the effort and the patience!

La Mav Sunkissed Bronzer provides a beautiful natural sun-kissed glow to your skin all year round. Perfect for contouring facial features especially cheekbones nose and chin. Simply buff the Bronzer with La Mav Vegan Kabuki Brush and you're ready to go with a natural bronze look.

Order Your Bronzer Now


How do you "hide" rosacea? Share with us your makeup secrets for dealing with rosacea in the comment section below! We are curious to know how you take care of your skin and what you do to make it look perfect!

If you liked this post, let us know by sharing it! Share and get $5 off for youre next order with La Mav!



from La Mav Combined http://ift.tt/1At7JvI
via IFTTT

Peek-a-blue

Using colour can sometimes put you at risk of looking clown-like, but when used with the right colour combination and applied using the correct techniques, you can rock any colour with confidence! Continue Reading

from La Mav Combined http://snip.ly/h2kH
via IFTTT

Vitamins That Reduce Your Risk of Skin Cancer

By Dr. Mercola

If you’re like most people, you’ve probably fallen for the misguided advice from most dermatologists and public health officials to stay out of the sun to avoid skin cancer. Unfortunately, total sun avoidance is inadvisable, as it can actually increase your risk rather than lower it.

Vitamin D, which is metabolized when UV rays strike your skin, has been shown to reduce not only your risk of melanoma—the deadliest form or skin cancer—but also the most common types of cancer. According to Australian researchers, vitamin B3 (nicotinamide) may also offer protection for those who are prone to certain skin cancers.1,2

Vitamin B3 May Reduce Recurrence of Some Skin Cancers

As reported by NBC News:3

“The Australian researchers tested it on 386 people who had already been diagnosed with skin cancer - either squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma. These are extremely common and slow-growing cancers, much less serious than melanoma...

The volunteers took either two 500 mg vitamin B3 pills a day for a year, or a placebo. After a year, those who took the B3 were 23 percent less likely to have another cancer diagnosed...

The pills also reduced the numbers of pre-cancerous lesions called actinic keratosis. These thick, scaly patches of skin were reduced by 20 percent among the volunteers who took nicotinamide after nine months of treatment.”

Those who took nicotinamide started seeing results in about three months. However, the protection vaporized once they stopped taking the vitamin, so to reap the rewards, you’d have to continue taking it indefinitely.

It’s thought that nicotinamide works by helping repair DNA damage caused by excessive UV exposure, and by bolstering your immune system.

That said, at present the researchers only recommend the supplement to those who are prone to skin cancer. It’s still unknown whether it might confer protection against skin cancer among the general population.

Is Sunscreen the Best Way to Avoid Skin Cancer?

Most news outlets publicizing this study point out you need to use sunscreen to avoid skin damage and cancer. But as many vitamin D experts have noted, the advice to avoid the sun as much as possible can have equally if not greater adverse health effects.

Can UV radiation be dangerous? Yes. It can increase your risk for certain skin cancers such as squamous cell, and basal cell. But there are significant differences even between these cancers, and appropriate sun exposure may be more beneficial than detrimental in some cases.

As previously explained by Dr. John Cannell, one of the leading authorities on vitamin D and founder and executive director of the Vitamin D Council, squamous cell carcinoma is clearly associated with chronic sun exposure, and is more common on the face, hands, and scalp.

Melanoma, which is the deadliest form of skin cancer, is associated with sunburn, especially sunburns when you’re young, yet often appear on areas of your body that rarely if ever see the light of the sun. How can this be?

What often happens is that as people get older, their dermatologist will tell them they need to stay out of the sun because they’re starting to exhibit skin damage from a lifetime of sun exposure.

But once they shun the sun, they effectively prevent their bodies from working as nature designed it, and sun exposure is actually part and parcel of what helps keep skin cancer at bay...

Vitamin D is activated in your skin, and activated vitamin D influences the genes in your skin and helps prevent the type of abnormalities that ultraviolet light causes. As a result, sun avoidance becomes the factor that paradoxically triggers skin cancer.

In a nutshell, the vitamin D your body produces in response to UVB radiation is protective against melanoma. As noted in one Lancet study:4

"Paradoxically, outdoor workers have a decreased risk of melanoma compared with indoor workers, suggesting that chronic sunlight exposure can have a protective effect."

Regularly applying sunscreen effectively prevents vitamin D activation in your skin, thereby preventing it from offering the protection it will naturally provide. Adding insult to injury, when you apply sunscreen you may also be more apt to stay in the sun far longer than you might otherwise, thereby adding to the skin damage.

Evidence suggests a wiser strategy would be to get sensible unprotected sun exposure on a large amount of bare skin to the point just short of your skin turning pink, and then cover up with a thin layer of clothing.

It’s also wise to wear a wide-brimmed hat when you’re outdoors for longer periods of time, as the skin on your face is more prone to damage and will not add much to your vitamin D stores.

Two Decade-Long Study Finds Sun Avoidance Doubles Risk of Death

A Swedish study5 published last year followed nearly 30,000 middle-aged to older women for up to 20 years. The average follow-up was 15 years. At the outset, they asked a number of questions about sun exposure, such as: Do you sunbathe? Do you take vacations in sunny areas in the winter? Do you garden with short sleeves and shorts? And, do you use sunbeds? What they discovered was that women who avoided the sun were twice as likely to die over the course of the study.

The researchers attributed this finding to the influence of vitamin D. What this study shows is that chronic sun exposure appears to be associated with less mortality. It’s also the first study to show that women who use tanning beds live longer than those who don’t. This is in direct conflict with what almost every dermatologist will say, including the former US Surgeon General, who was a dermatologist. It’s unfortunate, but the danger of almost any specialist is that they fail to take the broader perspective.

Dermatologists see and treat the effects of UV overexposure every day, and therefore tend to ignore or minimize the other side of the equation, which is that sun exposure has a wide array of health benefits—one being a reduction in overall mortality as evidenced in this study. Such benefits are easily overlooked though, since no one will think to attribute a longer life and/or absence of disease to the fact that they spent time in the sun!

The Case for Safe, Sensible Sun Exposure

The number of studies attesting to the health benefits of vitamin D is now in the thousands. This includes a reduced risk of about 16 different cancers, including pancreatic, lung, ovarian, breast, prostate, and skin cancer. There are well over 800 references in the medical literature showing vitamin D's effectiveness against cancer alone, and the evidence suggests this reduction is around 50 percent. One Canadian study6 found that women who reported having the most sun exposure as a teenager and young adult had close to a 70 percent reduced risk of developing breast cancer.

Another study7,8 published in 2013 found women whose serum levels were below 10 ng/ml had six times the risk of breast cancer compared to those whose levels were above 20 ng/ml, and a 2014 study,9,10 which looked at Iranian women, found a 1,000 percent increase in the risk of breast cancer among those who covered themselves completely, thereby getting no exposure to sunlight! From my perspective, it’s insane not to take advantage of this natural cancer prevention strategy for fear of skin cancer.

Dr. William Grant of Sunlight, Nutrition, and Health Research Center (SUNARC) estimates that if everyone in the US had a vitamin D level of 40 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml), it would save approximately 150,000 lives a year.11 That’s 100 times the rate of squamous cell cancers, which is the only type of skin cancer definitively linked to chronic UV exposure.

Current recommendations place hundreds of thousands of people at greater risk for internal cancers, as opposed to 10,000 people who are dying from skin cancer caused by sunburn. Not only that, vitamin D is also known to provide many other health benefits, all of which are negated if you wholly abstain from sun exposure. For example, vitamin D helps support healthy:12

  • Immune function
  • Kidney function
  • Teeth and bones
  • Cardiovascular system
  • Brain function

Understand the Risks and Benefits of Sun Exposure

When it comes to sun exposure, it’s really a matter of making an educated risk-benefit analysis, and I believe it’s possible to optimize your benefits while minimizing your risk by getting safe, sensible sun exposure, and avoiding sunscreen. If dermatologists were indeed correct about using sunscreen to avoid melanoma, incidence should have decreased right along with the increase in sunscreen. Alas, over the past 30 years, as sunscreen use has risen, so has incidence of stage 1 melanoma.

Besides blocking the activation of vitamin D, many sunscreens also contain toxic ingredients, which is the last thing you need to slather on your skin if you’re concerned about your health. Making matters worse, sunscreens containing vitamin A and its derivatives (retinol and retinyl palmitate), and other hazardous ingredients such as oxybenzone, have been shown to increase the speed at which malignant cells develop and spread skin cancer.

Another important factor to remember is that SPF only protects against UVB rays, which are the rays within the ultraviolet spectrum that allow your body to produce vitamin D in your skin. But the most dangerous rays, in terms of causing skin damage and cancer are the UVA rays. So make sure any sunscreen you buy protects against UVAs as well as UVBs.

Five Tips for Safe and Sensible Sun Exposure

You definitely want to be very careful and always avoid getting burned-- virtually all of the harm from sun exposure is related to sunburn—but you also want to avoid shielding yourself from the sun entirely. Here are a few tips to help you reap maximum rewards while minimizing your risks:

  1. Expose large amounts of your skin (at least 40 percent of your body) to sunlight for short periods daily. If using a sunscreen, give your body a chance to produce vitamin D before you apply it, and be sure to select a non-toxic sun lotion that protects against both UVB and UVA rays. The Environmental Working Group offers a comprehensive “Guide to Sunscreens”13
  2. Stay out just long enough for your skin to turn the very lightest shade of pink, if you’re naturally light-skinned, or just a hint reddish if you’re dark-skinned. Shield your facefrom the sun using a safe sunscreen or hat, as your facial skin is thin and more prone to sun damage, such as premature wrinkling.
  3. When you'll be in the sun for longer periods, cover up with clothing, a hat, or shade (either natural or shade you create using an umbrella).
  4. Consider the use of an "internal sunscreen" like astaxanthin to gain additional sun protection. Astaxanthin is a potent antioxidant (and pigment) produced by marine algae in response to their exposure to UV light. Typically, it takes several weeks of daily supplementation to saturate your body’s tissues enough to provide protection.
  5. Consuming a healthy diet full of natural antioxidants is another useful strategy to help avoid sun damage. Fresh, raw, unprocessed vegetables and fruits deliver the nutrients that your body needs to maintain a healthy balance of omega-6 and omega-3 oils in your skin, which is your first line of defense against sunburn. Vegetables also provide your body with an abundance of powerful antioxidants that will help you fight the free radicals caused by sun damage that can lead to burns and cancer.


from La Mav Combined http://snip.ly/KcTg
via IFTTT